1)the academic learning in early Qing清初学术
英文短句/例句
1.On the Evolution of the Academic Ideology and Social Thought Trends in the Late-Ming and Early-Qing Period试析明末清初学术思想与社会思潮的演变态势
2.Instruction according to Disciplines and the Chinese Academic Transformation at the Turn of the Ming and Qing Dynasties;分科设学和清末民初中国的学术转型
3.Academic Exchanges between SUN Cheng-ze and Neo-Confucians in Early Qing Dynasty;试论清初降臣孙承泽与理学家的学术交往
4.The Scholarly Genealogy of Literature in Modern China--From "Letter" to "Fine Arts" and to "Literature";晚清民初“文学”学科的学术谱系——从“词章”到“美术”再到“文学”
5.The Influence That Chinese Painters and Academicians Who Had Been to Japan to Study at the End of Qing Dynasty and the Early of Republic of China Exerted on China s Contemporary Fine Arts;清末民初留日画人学人对中国近代美术的影响
6.Discussion on the trajectory and academic trend of the meridian research in the late Ming and early Qing Dynasties论明末清初经络研究的轨迹和学术走向
7.Academic Literature:Translation and Back-translation--Exemplified by the Chinese Back-translation of Building Culture in Early Qing Yangzhou;论学术翻译的文献回译——以梅尔清《清初扬州文化》中译本为例
8.A Preliminary Study of Zhu Ciqi s Academic Thought in Nanhai in the Late Qing Dynasty;千秋新学开南海 百世名儒仰九江——晚清鸿儒朱次琦学术思想初探
9.On the Relations between Prosperous of Academic Research and Flourishing of Private Collection of Books in the Jiangnan Area in Qing Dynasty;清代江南地区学术研究兴盛与私家藏书发达之关系初探
10.Translation of Chinese Classics by Christian Missionaries另类的“学术传教”——解析明末清初传教士对中国典籍的译介
11.Rabbit Serum Proteomics Analysis of Gut Originated Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome by Two-dimensional Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis用蛋白质组学技术分析家兔MODS血清蛋白质组的方法初探
12.The Jiangnan Art Market and Art Dealers in the Late-Ming and Early Qing Period;明末清初江南艺术市场与艺术交易人
13.Chinese Foreign-Educated Students and Foreign Language Education during the Period between the Late Qing Dynasty and the Early Republican China;中国留学生与清末民初外语教育初探
14.On Dai Zhen of the Modern Chinese Academic History;近代中国学术史上的戴震——以清末民初学者对其考据学之"科学"性的评估为核心
15.On the studies about the Book from Lixue to Puxue in The Early Period of Qing Dynasty.;论从理学到朴学转型期的清初《尚书》学
16.AN ANALYSIS ON THE NATURAL BEAUTY OF CHINESE LANDSCAPING DURING MING AND QING DYNASTIES;明清时期中国园林艺术的自然美初探
17.The Art Deco of "Chenshi Shu Yuan" Which is the Architecture of Mingqing Dynast of the South of Wuling岭南明清建筑“陈氏书院”装饰艺术初探
18.On the History-Archeological Investigation in the Trend of "Destruct Temples and Boost Learning" in the Period Early Ming;清末民初“废庙兴学”的历史人类学考察
相关短句/例句
medicine at the beginning of Qing dynasty清初医学
1.Ming diehards and the devolepment of medicine at the beginning of Qing dynasty;明遗民与清初医学的发展
3)the history science in the early period of Qing dynasty清初史学
4)style of study in the early Qing Dynasty清初学风
5)research of The Book of Songs at the beginning of the Qing Dynasty清初诗经学
1.The research of The Book of Songs at the beginning of the Qing Dynasty was featured by incorporating the research achievements of the Han and Song Dynasties to achieve a multi-dimensioned development and advocating a positivist research for a comprehensive summing-up.清初诗经学总体特征为:汉宋兼采,多元发展,主张实证,全面总结。
6)neo-neo-confucianism清初朱子学
1.This revival neo-confucianism is called "neo-neo-confucianism"in thinking direction, learning aspect and thinking way.本文认为 ,清代初期 ,思想学术的主流是复兴的程朱理学 ,这种复兴的程朱理学被称为“清初朱子学” ,清初朱子学在理论的致思方向、学术的侧重面、思想的方法等都与传统理学有了很大的不同。
延伸阅读
《清代学术概论》 中国近代思想家梁启超的著作。原是作者为蒋方震的《欧洲文艺复兴时代史》一书写的序,因篇幅过长,终于独立成书。他系统地概述了从明末到20世纪初 200多年间中国清代学术思想的发展，因而名为"清代学术概论"。1921年作为共学社史学丛书由商务印书馆印行。 作者认为，"清代思潮"的总趋势是"以复古为解放"，意即以复古的形式表达自己时代的新思潮：第一步，复宋之古，对于王学而得解放；第二步，复汉唐之古，对于程、朱而得解放；第三步，复西汉之古，对于许、郑而得解放；第四步，复先秦之古，对于一切传注而得解放。 本书把清代学术思想的发展划分为四个时期：启蒙期、全盛期、蜕分期与衰落期。清初为启蒙期，主要是批判宋明理学（特别是明代的王学）的空疏，提倡贵创、博证、致用。代表人物有顾炎武、王夫之、黄宗羲、颜元、阎若璩、胡渭等。乾隆、嘉庆时代为全盛期，学术上以考据学为中心,讲求"实事求是",重"证据"。主要代表人物是惠栋、戴震、段玉裁、王念孙、王引之。梁启超特别推崇戴震，借钱大昕的话，称他是"实事求是，不主一家"，并说"其志愿确欲为中国文化转一新方向，其哲学立脚点，真可称二千年一大翻案"。道光、咸丰以后进入蜕分期，且渐趋于衰落。清学的分裂导火线于今古文经学之争。清代今文经学派龚自珍、魏源、康有为等人从改革政治的需要出发，主张经世致用，以经术为治术，批判正统派为经学而经学的作风。梁启超以为今文经学之最有成就的是龚、魏，他们"虽言经学，而其精神与正统派之为经学而治经学者，则既有以异"。而康有为《新学伪经考》"实思想界之一大飓风"，《孔子改制考》、《大同书》则是"火山大喷火"，"大地震"。 《清代学术概论》运用资产阶级研究法，以进化发展观点，从思潮与人物相结合方面对清代学术思想进行了总的历史考察。因此，它在中国近代史上是一部开创性的具有历史意义的著作。但由于作者的资产阶级立场、观点的局限，本书没有能够科学地阐明清代学术思想的根源及其发展的客观规律。 (见彩图)
